For instance, stats aside, I always thought Deron williams was the best point guard in the league desypite CP3 having better success...until the end of last year when I stated that Westbrook Curry and Kyrie would be running shit.
Cp3 has had very little post season success and D. Williams was phenomenal in the playoffs against my Lakers a couple years in a row.
He is bigger and had a more complete game as far as overall offense.
As far as stats go Karl Malone is better than Charles Barkley...fuckin stats, chuck wagon was better than Malone by a lot. He was a scoring and rebounding machine and he blocked shots better. And fuck what the NBA says Malone could have made 100 all defense teams he wasn't guarding shit.
Reggie Miller statistically was the Pacers best player but in those years when they played the Bulls J Rose was hooping his ass off! He was certainly the teams best player. He was just a much more complete player than Miller.
Statistically Reggie Miller and Dan Marjle are about the same, what separates the two? Why is miller universally considered better?
Cp3 has had very little post season success and D. Williams was phenomenal in the playoffs against my Lakers a couple years in a row.
He is bigger and had a more complete game as far as overall offense.
As far as stats go Karl Malone is better than Charles Barkley...fuckin stats, chuck wagon was better than Malone by a lot. He was a scoring and rebounding machine and he blocked shots better. And fuck what the NBA says Malone could have made 100 all defense teams he wasn't guarding shit.
Reggie Miller statistically was the Pacers best player but in those years when they played the Bulls J Rose was hooping his ass off! He was certainly the teams best player. He was just a much more complete player than Miller.
Statistically Reggie Miller and Dan Marjle are about the same, what separates the two? Why is miller universally considered better?